foxxcub: (porn by stargirl1785)
So, remember waaay back last year when [livejournal.com profile] uberaeryn made her post concerning the hero complex similarities between Jack/Sawyer and Spike/Angel? This is kind of like that. Only not.

I blame this mostly on [livejournal.com profile] inthekeyofd.

Sexual Expertise and The Common Criminal (and the Ivy League Boys Who Love Them) )
foxxcub: (BBM by julissak01)
So here I was, all excited to learn that over ten people--who are NOT on my flist and completely unknown to me--have Jack/James listed in their interests...and then come to find out that, um, it's not that Jack/James. Wot, like it's a common name pairing?

*headdesk*

Hi, I'm a dork.

To keep this from being utter spam, here's a question I pose to you all, because I've often wondered where people stand on the issue. When it comes to fanfic, does it matter to you whether it's for TV/Movies or an actual published book? I know many of you in the HP fandom don't have qualms about this whatsoever, but I've always felt odd about writing fic for book. But I'm seriously considering writing BBM fic, and yet I'm still leary about writing something off of someone else. Sure, you can argue that TV/Movie fanfic is just as much spinning off of someone's written work as any, but I've never questioned myself when it comes to sitting down and writing A fic of B show. Unless you've got the script sitting in front of you, you're never going to see the characters in written word form (novelizations aside).

There are no "new" ideas. And sometimes, I just have to poke myself with a stick and remind myself that fanfic is flattery. Annie Proulx won't hunt me down and cut off my thumb, just like J.K. Rowling isn't using satellite tracking to shoot lasers into millions of computers everywhere.

stuff

Nov. 2nd, 2005 09:03 pm
foxxcub: (subtext by oollah)
Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] gambits_rogue, I signed the petition to have the artwork on the Serenity DVD changed. Because this? Kind of looks like ass. And Nathan is not nearly big enough.

Feeling a little better tonight after sleeping for twelve billion hours today. I still feel a bit like I've been hit by a truck. Plus I watched the season premiere of "That 70's Show" and my worst fears were confirmed--this show cannot survive without Topher. And to be honest, I don't want to watch it without Topher. It should've ended last year; teh funny is gone.

The best part about watching the rerun of "Orientation" tonight was knowing that in one week I will have wounded!Sawyer back. That is all.

On a slightly different note, I came across this interesting discussion about canon support of pairings in various fandoms at [livejournal.com profile] metafandom. Unfortunately, the person who started the post doesn't know a thing about Lost, so my ramblings were slightly pointless. But I thought I'd share them with you all and get your feedback on them. Also, feel free to throw Prison Break and Firefly into the mix if you feel like it. :)

Here are the ratings for canon support of pairings as created by [livejournal.com profile] petronelle:

0 - No way, no how.

1 - Convince me.

2 - It's vaguely possible.

3 - I can see it, sometimes.

4 - They're probably doing it.

5 - What do you mean they're not?

6 - Canon.

My views on pairings in Lost, edited )

So what do you think? Bueller?
foxxcub: (skate by lakicons)
I've been thinking a lot about why I was so severely depressed after last week's ep, and I realize now that I unfairly blamed the ep itself for my depression. Yes, there was peanut butter and schmaltz, but overall, it WAS a great ep and I adore Hurley more than ever.

After much (and mostly liked too much) thought on what the hell my deal is, I came to this conclusion: I cannot, it seems, give up my 'ship. And I'm not talking fanon 'ship, because fanon 'ships you never really let go. Look at the Harry/Hermione people, for Christ's sake--canon doesn't stop them for a second, and it shouldn't. Fandom exists, at its core, to play to people's fantasies and let them do what they wish with the characters, whether canon itself allows it or not. Fanon allows mpreg and noncon and hopeless fluff to co-exist with each other; it's part of what makes fandom great.

But when it comes to canon, the malleability becomes much lower and fantasy goes out the window.

The U.S.S. Het can never sink )

Wow. This so wasn't the Sayid essay I first intended to write. Heh. o__O
foxxcub: (hell by laura4lad)
As I would like to refrain from spamming my LJ today, I'm posting all my thoughts together. Whoa.

thoughts on the state of slash in the Prison Break fandom )

TEH JATE SHOWER SCENE OMG LIEK WHOA )

Speaking of wounded Sawyer...

SQUEEEEEE spoilers for 2.06 )
foxxcub: (make-out scene)
(OMG, [livejournal.com profile] themoononastick: Eeeeeee!! Teh Promo pretteh!!!! Thankyouthankyou

And haha, I don't know who half those people are on the front! XD)

I have some thoughts on slash writing, which were mostly spawned from [livejournal.com profile] uberaeryn's post on butt sex.

because we already know they're hawt )
foxxcub: (Default)
I thought about f-locking this, but I'd like to have several opinions on this, since I'm curious as to what everyone's policies are when it comes to friending. I very rarely f-lock anything, and I will never make my journal friends only, because what's the fun in that? But I'm also getting to the point where I'm no longer immediately friending people back when I've seen that I've been friended. The flist is getting rather large (100+ in seven months, wow!!), and I just start to feel guilty when I'm only commenting on a handful of posts a day. I went through today and deleted a few people, mostly those whom I have nothing in common with or no longer post anything, and it's hard, because I don't want to hurt feelings or step on toes.

But issues have come up amongst my closer LJ friends about people basically insisting that they be friended and then pimped out to that person's other friends, which, for lack of a better word, is lame. You would never force someone to be friends with you in RL, so why demand it in cyberspace?

I guess my question is when do you stop friending? If you've got a humongous flist, when do you get to the point where you say, "thank you, but no thank you"? And do you always let others know when they've been defriended, and is this considered the polite thing to do?

Also, for those of you who could care less, a pointless poll simply for my curiosity:


[Poll #547512]
foxxcub: (eyefucking by mediocrechick)
So last night I wandered into this post on fandom definitions, and while I read the whole thing out of curiosity, I didn't appreciate their definition of "erotica" as opposed to "smut".

For example...

Erotica: Fanfic containing erotic involvement between characters (or real people). 'Erotica' is sometimes considered a mild form of pornography. Much fanfic contains erotica, as opposed to more graphic sexual activity (or 'smut'). [Note: Most fanfic authors feel that their work -- even when self-defined as graphic or smut -- would never fall in the category of actual pornography.] [see Smut, Graphic Sex]

but conversely...

Smut: Smut refers (in a light and/or humorous way) to very graphic or base sexual interactions between characters (real people). [Note: It's generally considered important to include a smut (or graphic sex) 'warning' inside a fanfic template.] [see Erotica, Graphic Sex, Template, Warnings]

"Light and/or humorous way"?! O___o Um, okay. Guess all my fics have been humorous, then. WTF.

These are egregious definitions, folks, and I'm sure any writer in the romance genre will agree with me wholeheartedly. The simple fact is, comparing smut to erotica is like contrasting the vocal stylings of Jessica Simpson and Britney. They're the same goddamn thing. One might have a slightly different tone than the other and you wouldn't always want to claim you're one or the other, but it's still basically the same. Thing. The fact that they made up two different sections for these terms kills me. See how they're BOTH cross-referenced with "graphic sex"? *headdesk*

I write smut with erotic overtures. It's called pr0n.

;p
foxxcub: (eyefucking by mediocrechick)
For quite awhile now I've heard various rumblings about the Robin Hobb rant against fanfic, but I'd never stopped to read on it because, frankly, my opinion on professional authors lambasting against fanfic is that they can bite it. End of story.

But then I read [livejournal.com profile] storydivagirl's insightful meta contradicting said rant, and then discovered the joys of [livejournal.com profile] metafandom, and well, this rant was born. Because there are few things I get worked up about, but fanfic snobs always get my goat.

yeah, I prostitute myself and I love it )

Profile

foxxcub: (Default)
aleesha

November 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 3rd, 2026 05:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios