foxxcub: (b/k by alazysod)
aleesha ([personal profile] foxxcub) wrote2006-06-12 12:55 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Excerpt from "Maximum Insecurity: Genre Trouble and Closet Erotics in and out of HBO's Oz" by Joe Wlodarz (as published in the Duke University magazine Camera Obscura):

What in fact makes Oz so deliciously compelling (and steamy) is the way it consistenly thwarts clear, coherent, and unambiguous expressions of gay desire and identification in favor of a more enticing erotic uncertainty. For it is indeed the combination of hypermasculinity and feminization, the displays and conflicts of manhood, affective excess, and sexual ambiguity that make the series so irresistable to its fans--especially to women and gay male fans--and that, accordingly, establish the program as such as an intriguing example of and source of slash fiction.

It's sad how much that paragraph alone makes me flail in fangirl bliss. GodDAMN, I love this show.

I am such a nerd.

(Thanks again, [livejournal.com profile] luci_2!!)

[identity profile] foxxcub.livejournal.com 2006-06-12 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Awww, there's nowhere you could use Adobe Acrobat?

[identity profile] foxxcub.livejournal.com 2006-06-12 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, I could also print it off and mail it to you, if you'd like. :)

[identity profile] rileyc.livejournal.com 2006-06-13 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Well thank you, that's sweet of you.

[identity profile] foxxcub.livejournal.com 2006-06-13 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Just email me (foxxcub@livejournal.com) your address and I'll send it off. ;)

[identity profile] rileyc.livejournal.com 2006-06-12 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope. This computer's retarded. *cries*

[identity profile] luci-2.livejournal.com 2006-06-12 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Butting in, but I understood Foxxcub was proposing to send you the article by snail mail.

It's the only way, with your awful computer. I would do it, from across
the pond, if there's no one nearer to do it.

[identity profile] rileyc.livejournal.com 2006-06-13 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I see that now. LJ hadn't sent me that second message (or Yahoo didn't deliver it).